09-25-2017, 07:04 PM
[quote TubeDude][#0000ff]But local farmers, home owners and business owners who would be impacted by it...not so much. [/#0000ff][#0000ff][/quote]
[#000000]Of course not! When are famers and business owners ever excited to improve wildlife habitat??[/#000000]
[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][quote TubeDude]And, unfortunately for suckerkind, most anglers who favor the warm water predator species in the lake don't much care for the idea of messing up their fishing for the sake of a "worthless sucker".
[/#0000ff][/quote]
This ^^^ is crazy talk.
Improving habitat would only improve things for those "warm water" predator species.
The only thing that might impact those "anglers" (term used loosely) is that they wouldn't be able to plunk in that deep, slow, back-water currently called the provo river inlet. So they might have to find a new spot to catch walleye -- is that really a valid argument against habitat improvement??
[signature]
[#000000]Of course not! When are famers and business owners ever excited to improve wildlife habitat??[/#000000]
[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][quote TubeDude]And, unfortunately for suckerkind, most anglers who favor the warm water predator species in the lake don't much care for the idea of messing up their fishing for the sake of a "worthless sucker".
[/#0000ff][/quote]
This ^^^ is crazy talk.
Improving habitat would only improve things for those "warm water" predator species.
The only thing that might impact those "anglers" (term used loosely) is that they wouldn't be able to plunk in that deep, slow, back-water currently called the provo river inlet. So they might have to find a new spot to catch walleye -- is that really a valid argument against habitat improvement??
[signature]