12-03-2019, 12:45 AM
See both attached pictures.
(I could have done a better job, if I knew how to post in the post rather than attached. Perhaps someone can tell me how.)
Edit: It is my intention that both pictures be viewed at the same time to fit our discussion of this June Sucker which is extinct is just a reservoir of a minimal amount of genetic material, but for what purpose?
Being heavily funded, purpose becomes whatever political diversion of funds can accomplish.
I'm grateful for those who are knowledgeable in our fine group to make us aware of the only trace of genetic material and the discussion of how that was used for funding various projects. I was totally unaware of that and was trusting news sources, so thanks for making me aware.
I posted the two pictures quickly due to time constraints and lacking computer graphics talent, couldn't merge them to show them together to show the connection of false claims.
The only political intent was to show that claims of genetic material has been used politically in both the one picture and the June Sucker funding.
It is not my intention to single out either side of the political candidates, so I included both as being insincere yet intend for that to be viewed in context with the fish similarly not a real June Sucker though used for political funding advantages.
You might see something fishy here, but it is truly presented as a fish discussion and the projects and use of our tax dollars that effects our fishing.
I invite help in modifications with some graphic ingenuity from those so skilled. Please post what you create for me to remove what might be individually misinterpreted as a political post.
[signature]
(I could have done a better job, if I knew how to post in the post rather than attached. Perhaps someone can tell me how.)
Edit: It is my intention that both pictures be viewed at the same time to fit our discussion of this June Sucker which is extinct is just a reservoir of a minimal amount of genetic material, but for what purpose?
Being heavily funded, purpose becomes whatever political diversion of funds can accomplish.
I'm grateful for those who are knowledgeable in our fine group to make us aware of the only trace of genetic material and the discussion of how that was used for funding various projects. I was totally unaware of that and was trusting news sources, so thanks for making me aware.
I posted the two pictures quickly due to time constraints and lacking computer graphics talent, couldn't merge them to show them together to show the connection of false claims.
The only political intent was to show that claims of genetic material has been used politically in both the one picture and the June Sucker funding.
It is not my intention to single out either side of the political candidates, so I included both as being insincere yet intend for that to be viewed in context with the fish similarly not a real June Sucker though used for political funding advantages.
You might see something fishy here, but it is truly presented as a fish discussion and the projects and use of our tax dollars that effects our fishing.
I invite help in modifications with some graphic ingenuity from those so skilled. Please post what you create for me to remove what might be individually misinterpreted as a political post.
[signature]