08-15-2007, 07:32 PM
agreed in the point that it is inapropreate to revert to name calling, It is one thing to sling mud, but it would be apropreate to say I am discusted that the military has been taking recrutes streight out of prisons across the country to work along side law biding americans to whom they have no idea they are working side by side with convicted fellons creates a level of insucurity not only with our comrads at arms but it puts a level of unresslesness among americans at home who wory about how they will represent us in action, And yes they are represintitives of this country.
I agree that the name calling leaves every one clueless as to what any one is talking about. some one might have a valid point in their ramblings, but unless it is put in to words discribing the problem then it is not part of the solution but part of the problem...
I disagree with the moderation, heavily moderated dosnt mean heavily cencored... This entire site among the rest of the sites owned BFT is heavily moderated. Every one should be able to discuss freely any issues and not have to wory about being attacked because their views differ from some one elses...
And lets face it, attacking some one because they choose not to understand that Hillery Clinton is anti gun and has made this perfectly clear in the past two presidential elections when making financial contributions to both the Gore and Kerry campains. what I mean is if you attack them how are you going to convince them that her ajendas would be detrimental to our home land sucurity, Lets face it, The fact that a major portion of law biding citizens in america own and carry fire arms and are ready willing and able to step out on the street and face tirants, millitants, terrorist head on and need no financial backing from any group or government.
Look at iraq, it is unlawfull for citizens to own and brandish fire arms and the majority of those beeing killed are unarmed citizens who can not defend them selves.
[signature]
I agree that the name calling leaves every one clueless as to what any one is talking about. some one might have a valid point in their ramblings, but unless it is put in to words discribing the problem then it is not part of the solution but part of the problem...
I disagree with the moderation, heavily moderated dosnt mean heavily cencored... This entire site among the rest of the sites owned BFT is heavily moderated. Every one should be able to discuss freely any issues and not have to wory about being attacked because their views differ from some one elses...
And lets face it, attacking some one because they choose not to understand that Hillery Clinton is anti gun and has made this perfectly clear in the past two presidential elections when making financial contributions to both the Gore and Kerry campains. what I mean is if you attack them how are you going to convince them that her ajendas would be detrimental to our home land sucurity, Lets face it, The fact that a major portion of law biding citizens in america own and carry fire arms and are ready willing and able to step out on the street and face tirants, millitants, terrorist head on and need no financial backing from any group or government.
Look at iraq, it is unlawfull for citizens to own and brandish fire arms and the majority of those beeing killed are unarmed citizens who can not defend them selves.
[signature]