08-21-2007, 10:45 PM
who voted in 2004 and who is registered to vote in 2007 are two different numbers.
I fully agree on the electoral collage...[mad]
no doubt I too am not a big fan of the electoral collage, I think it is bunk in this day and age. When it was set up it was susposed to make the counting faster because it would take weeks up to a couple months just collecting the votes from districts.
today we dont need it. It should be thrown out. It is a method of corupting the political election system. It corupts elections all the way down to city levels where if one district votes for a mayor and he gets 51% he gets all the votes from that district... If ya ask me, that is just plain wrong...
same thing happened to nixon in the kenedy election... boy was he hot [shocked]
[signature]
I fully agree on the electoral collage...[mad]
no doubt I too am not a big fan of the electoral collage, I think it is bunk in this day and age. When it was set up it was susposed to make the counting faster because it would take weeks up to a couple months just collecting the votes from districts.
today we dont need it. It should be thrown out. It is a method of corupting the political election system. It corupts elections all the way down to city levels where if one district votes for a mayor and he gets 51% he gets all the votes from that district... If ya ask me, that is just plain wrong...
same thing happened to nixon in the kenedy election... boy was he hot [shocked]
[signature]