07-23-2009, 05:42 PM
Ok here it goes.
No attack intended on this post either, but I have to get this out there [:/]
I'm having a really hard time with people posting incorrect weights and lengths of fish. Just because you hold the fish closer to the camera, doesn't mean the fish is ACTUALLY bigger. Take a look at the following pictures
[inline "5 pound brown.bmp"]
[inline "Causey Brown 3.JPG"]
[inline "8 pounds 13 oz brown.bmp"]
You say the brown you caught was 9 pounds. The brown in the second pic is under 9 pounds, but has double the girth and length. How is that possible???
I have seen many big browns in my days and I'm pretty sure that doesn't break the 9 pound mark, infact I would probably give it half that. Maybe there was a error in your scale or something, but I'm having a really hard time understanding this 9 pound thing. Please enlighten me if I'm wrong and help me understand.
[signature]
No attack intended on this post either, but I have to get this out there [:/]
I'm having a really hard time with people posting incorrect weights and lengths of fish. Just because you hold the fish closer to the camera, doesn't mean the fish is ACTUALLY bigger. Take a look at the following pictures
[inline "5 pound brown.bmp"]
[inline "Causey Brown 3.JPG"]
[inline "8 pounds 13 oz brown.bmp"]
You say the brown you caught was 9 pounds. The brown in the second pic is under 9 pounds, but has double the girth and length. How is that possible???
I have seen many big browns in my days and I'm pretty sure that doesn't break the 9 pound mark, infact I would probably give it half that. Maybe there was a error in your scale or something, but I'm having a really hard time understanding this 9 pound thing. Please enlighten me if I'm wrong and help me understand.
[signature]