12-28-2009, 06:31 PM
[quote TubeDude][cool]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]Like other comments on the Pineview thread, I have found it ludicrous that they would try to protect the dam from ice fishing terrorists while leaving the road across the top of the dam open to a truckload of explosives...or the base of the dam open to access by anyone who wanted to pack in a boom boom.[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]Don't have to make no sense, man. It's the gummint at work.[/#0000ff][/quote]
Hmmm little extreme statement there don't ya think??? Yep it’s all a sinister plot by the government against anglers who only ice fish the PV Narrows.
There's a reason the buoys were moved and maybe the 'real' reason will be soon known. I'm think'n it's because PV is a federally owned/managed...but that's just me. Maybe the buoys will get moved back…maybe they’ll be totally removed. I kinda doubt it though.
Now and not to get into a water-stream contest, but why isn't any attention/pressure being made to the parking situation at the Narrows to prevent an accident from the vehicles parked partly in the road, folks walking around vehicles in the road...to me an incident/accident scenario is more likely to happen because the lack of parking then anything with the dam itself.
So why isn't some pressures being made and questions asked about the lack of parking including plowing the Port Ramp for those who don't necessarily believe all the big fish (Crappie/Perch) solely reside in the Narrows?
Maybe I don’t see the ‘entire’ PV fish population being up the Narrows…yes I can and sincerely appreciate some anglers are upset with the buoys being moved…but really now…are the buoys more important than ensuring there’s parking and preventing a real incident/accident from happening involving a vehicle and/or a pedestrian because of the lack of parking???
What should we focus on 1) Buoys being moved or 2) adequate parking for vehicles and safe walking for people??? What would happen first 1) Buoys moved or 2) Plowing areas making parking more adequate at PV ????
[signature]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]Like other comments on the Pineview thread, I have found it ludicrous that they would try to protect the dam from ice fishing terrorists while leaving the road across the top of the dam open to a truckload of explosives...or the base of the dam open to access by anyone who wanted to pack in a boom boom.[/#0000ff]
[#0000ff][/#0000ff]
[#0000ff]Don't have to make no sense, man. It's the gummint at work.[/#0000ff][/quote]
Hmmm little extreme statement there don't ya think??? Yep it’s all a sinister plot by the government against anglers who only ice fish the PV Narrows.
There's a reason the buoys were moved and maybe the 'real' reason will be soon known. I'm think'n it's because PV is a federally owned/managed...but that's just me. Maybe the buoys will get moved back…maybe they’ll be totally removed. I kinda doubt it though.
Now and not to get into a water-stream contest, but why isn't any attention/pressure being made to the parking situation at the Narrows to prevent an accident from the vehicles parked partly in the road, folks walking around vehicles in the road...to me an incident/accident scenario is more likely to happen because the lack of parking then anything with the dam itself.
So why isn't some pressures being made and questions asked about the lack of parking including plowing the Port Ramp for those who don't necessarily believe all the big fish (Crappie/Perch) solely reside in the Narrows?
Maybe I don’t see the ‘entire’ PV fish population being up the Narrows…yes I can and sincerely appreciate some anglers are upset with the buoys being moved…but really now…are the buoys more important than ensuring there’s parking and preventing a real incident/accident from happening involving a vehicle and/or a pedestrian because of the lack of parking???
What should we focus on 1) Buoys being moved or 2) adequate parking for vehicles and safe walking for people??? What would happen first 1) Buoys moved or 2) Plowing areas making parking more adequate at PV ????
[signature]