06-26-2010, 05:23 PM
I have no general problem with the WIA program the DWR runs. I do 100% oppose the institution of a stamp that requires anglers to foot the bill for the WIA program.
Here are my reasons why:
1- This is "public access" not just angler access. This is a "public issue" not just an angler issue. The public should pay, not just anglers. Kayakers, tubers, bird watchers, hunters, waders, swimmers, all have a right to access these waters. Why should then anglers have to foot the bill?
2- The WIA program allows a landowner to set private regulations on their land in the program outside of the state's reach. They can limit the amount of people who go on per day. The type of fishing they can do. These are state waters, with state fish in them. The landowner should not dictate what regulations are in place. They own the land underneath the water, but NOTHING in the water. They should not regulate what takes place in the water. The state should do that.
3- The WIA also allows an owner to pull out of the program "at any time." What the heck good is increased fees for me to fish in this state if it doesn't get me perpetual access? The state should be purchasing permanent easements through the general fund if they are doing anything on this.
The landowners cried for just compensation. McFiction and his cronies cried for just compensation. Justly compensate the landowners and end the conflict.
[signature]
Here are my reasons why:
1- This is "public access" not just angler access. This is a "public issue" not just an angler issue. The public should pay, not just anglers. Kayakers, tubers, bird watchers, hunters, waders, swimmers, all have a right to access these waters. Why should then anglers have to foot the bill?
2- The WIA program allows a landowner to set private regulations on their land in the program outside of the state's reach. They can limit the amount of people who go on per day. The type of fishing they can do. These are state waters, with state fish in them. The landowner should not dictate what regulations are in place. They own the land underneath the water, but NOTHING in the water. They should not regulate what takes place in the water. The state should do that.
3- The WIA also allows an owner to pull out of the program "at any time." What the heck good is increased fees for me to fish in this state if it doesn't get me perpetual access? The state should be purchasing permanent easements through the general fund if they are doing anything on this.
The landowners cried for just compensation. McFiction and his cronies cried for just compensation. Justly compensate the landowners and end the conflict.
[signature]