Stream Access Bill to be floated

[sinergy]

Thanks for post I was just wondering about this the other day.. The bill sounds like a step in the right direction, the one thing that got me was:

" It would also allow a property owner to place a fence or barrier across a public waterway in certain circumstances.

What considered a certain circumstance ?

But it does say

"It does allow access on public right of ways or easements."

"Pitcher claims his legislation will address boating, wading, swimming and fishing in a stream corridor that is at or below a high-water mark."

Which I find fair no one is looking to access private land from private property just access to the stream up to the high watermark ...

Thanks Again for posting
[signature]