09-06-2014, 02:01 AM
[quote flygoddess]Agreed. But I would love to see some fly only waters here in Utah[
][
][/quote]
I could support having some of our critical native cutt waters switched to single hook or single barbless, but I guess I don't see the point in trying to make waters "fly only". It would seem to be too much hassle defining what "fly only" is with no biological/resource benefit.
Why would you like to see fly only designation used?
[signature]
][][/quote]I could support having some of our critical native cutt waters switched to single hook or single barbless, but I guess I don't see the point in trying to make waters "fly only". It would seem to be too much hassle defining what "fly only" is with no biological/resource benefit.
Why would you like to see fly only designation used?
[signature]