04-13-2015, 07:30 PM
Sad to see the fighting and name calling between fishermen.
This whole access thing is playing out just as it has already played out in the majority of states.
Based on historical navagalility, only a handful of stretches, of a handful of rivers in Utah will fall under this type of ruling when all is said and done.
If the water way can not be shown to be navtatable the land owner owns the bank and the bed, and can keep you off.
That is the law in most states, set that way because common sense has prevailed by way of much back and forth in our legal and legislative system.
Fight for what is yours and don't covet what is not yours.
The name Stream Access should be changed to River Access.
[signature]
This whole access thing is playing out just as it has already played out in the majority of states.
Based on historical navagalility, only a handful of stretches, of a handful of rivers in Utah will fall under this type of ruling when all is said and done.
If the water way can not be shown to be navtatable the land owner owns the bank and the bed, and can keep you off.
That is the law in most states, set that way because common sense has prevailed by way of much back and forth in our legal and legislative system.
Fight for what is yours and don't covet what is not yours.
The name Stream Access should be changed to River Access.
[signature]