Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scofield survey results
#10
I'm not sure what the answer is here, but I'm pretty sure it's not Rotenone. It's expensive, difficult to acquire, and ultimately neither a quick nor permanent solution.

What is the opposition to planting walleye and/or wipers? Is it just that too many people want to have rainbows to catch and take home?

What went wrong with Scofield? Is it simply a case of too many people taking home adult-chub-eating-sized trout? Is it that the biology of the water has changed?

If it were up to me I'd stock whatever species is necessary to control the chubs, as long as that species is a good sport fish. And I'd adjust the regulations such that the fishery can sustain whatever pressure it's getting - even if that means very few people can take home fish. I welcome the slot limits.
[signature]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Scofield survey results - by AmyC - 11-17-2016, 06:43 PM
Re: [AmyC] Scofield survey results - by dregs - 11-18-2016, 09:51 PM
Re: [AmyC] Scofield survey results - by gofish435 - 11-19-2016, 12:00 AM
Re: [AmyC] Scofield survey results - by 300win - 11-20-2016, 09:22 PM
Re: [300win] Scofield survey results - by Fishrmn - 11-21-2016, 09:43 AM
Re: [AmyC] Scofield survey results - by Charina - 11-21-2016, 06:14 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)