11-23-2016, 02:31 AM
[quote sinergy]Its one in the same [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000](No, it is not) [/#800000][/font]not my fault you cant make the connection [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000](That's because there is no connection to make. Liberal masses are being led by paid instigators and are destroying property and causing bodily injuries to those who dare disagree with them. Politicians simply took no action in Congress or voted against legislation they deemed unfit for consumption by the general citizenry. That hardly makes them one in the same.)[/#800000][/font]. Republicans\Conservatives protested but did it in a much worse manner at least in my opinion. [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000](Everybody is entitled to have an opinion regardless of it's value to anybody else. Your opinion of the actions of Congress being worse than the Liberal masses destroying property and injuring other folks is worthless - in my opinion.) [/#800000][/font]They vowed to blocked or objected to any policy Obama tried to pass regardless if the bill help this country or not. [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000](You, of course, can back that up with valid, verifiable sources[/#800000][/font] [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000]- otherwise know as facts - by providing links to transgressions supposedly committed by the right 8 years ago? After all, people say things all the time on the Internet that simply aren't true and I wouldn't want you to be lumped in with all those other folks that wouldn't know a fact if it bit them on the nose.) [/#800000][/font]
The list I posted shows bills blocked by Republicans\Conservatives that again would have help this county, some of which later would be brought back to life by Republicans\Conservatives but with there own agendas. [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000](Again, how could you possibly know beyond a shadow of a doubt that those bills would have helped or hurt this country? You can not because there is no way to absolutely determine the effect something will have if it never existed. If a bill was never approved, it never existed and it's effect cannot be known.) [/#800000][/font] Bottom line is a protest can take many shapes and forms just because Politicians aren't in the streets doesn't mean they didn't "protest" \"riot" against a the President of this country. [#800000][font "Comic Sans MS"](It's quite evident that you don't understand the difference between a protest and a riot. They definitely are NOT the same thing.[#800000] Riots can be defined as a civil condition where people behave violently and out of order, i.e., the recent gatherings of the Liberal masses to voice their displeasure over Donald Trump being elected as the next President of the United States. Riots can be results of any kind of mistreatment, injustice or oppression by an authority,[/#800000][/font][font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000] government[/#800000][/font][/#800000][font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000], or the people themselves. They can also be the result of uneducated and ignorant people being led by paid instigators. [/#800000][/font][font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000] Protests, on the other hand, can be defined as a form of expression over a dislike by a group of people and these are more peaceful and do not usually go against the law, unlike the recent gatherings of the Liberal masses.)[/#800000][/font][font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000]
[/#800000][/font]
So what, people are protesting its a civil liberty no different than the Boston Tea Party The Tea Party riot were against the British Tea taxation that lead to the revolution of this country.
To add protest were also a large part in desegregation of African Americans in this country and The Womens right to vote look it up this country has a long history of protests. [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000](Yes, they were PROTESTS, not riots. They were peaceful and for the most part nonviolent. What little violence there was in the case of desegregation came from those groups that were against desegregation, i.e., the KKK.)[/#800000][/font]
You need research it this country and its freedoms were found upon a rebellion\protest\riot against the establishment. [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000](I don't need to research anything. I'm 74 years young, graduated from High School and College. I do know how and when our country was formed and by whom and for what reasons. I am 100% sure that what went on in the late 1700s has absolutely NO correlation with the riots happening today over Trumps election. I'm not surprised at all by the fact that you don't see that.) [/#800000][/font]
Give it break with self appointing yourself with a successful argument your argument is hypocrisy to say the least considering your rant on this board could be considered a protest[font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000]....(I'll give it a break when somebody from the far left can defend this disgusting show of ignorance and crybaby attitude from the Liberal masses over Donald Trumps election. It's obvious that you don't have the talent to do so. Most Liberals hardly ever do have the talent. But it sure is entertaining to watch them try.) [#000000][/[/#000000][/#800000][/font]quote]
[signature]
The list I posted shows bills blocked by Republicans\Conservatives that again would have help this county, some of which later would be brought back to life by Republicans\Conservatives but with there own agendas. [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000](Again, how could you possibly know beyond a shadow of a doubt that those bills would have helped or hurt this country? You can not because there is no way to absolutely determine the effect something will have if it never existed. If a bill was never approved, it never existed and it's effect cannot be known.) [/#800000][/font] Bottom line is a protest can take many shapes and forms just because Politicians aren't in the streets doesn't mean they didn't "protest" \"riot" against a the President of this country. [#800000][font "Comic Sans MS"](It's quite evident that you don't understand the difference between a protest and a riot. They definitely are NOT the same thing.[#800000] Riots can be defined as a civil condition where people behave violently and out of order, i.e., the recent gatherings of the Liberal masses to voice their displeasure over Donald Trump being elected as the next President of the United States. Riots can be results of any kind of mistreatment, injustice or oppression by an authority,[/#800000][/font][font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000] government[/#800000][/font][/#800000][font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000], or the people themselves. They can also be the result of uneducated and ignorant people being led by paid instigators. [/#800000][/font][font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000] Protests, on the other hand, can be defined as a form of expression over a dislike by a group of people and these are more peaceful and do not usually go against the law, unlike the recent gatherings of the Liberal masses.)[/#800000][/font][font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000]
[/#800000][/font]
So what, people are protesting its a civil liberty no different than the Boston Tea Party The Tea Party riot were against the British Tea taxation that lead to the revolution of this country.
To add protest were also a large part in desegregation of African Americans in this country and The Womens right to vote look it up this country has a long history of protests. [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000](Yes, they were PROTESTS, not riots. They were peaceful and for the most part nonviolent. What little violence there was in the case of desegregation came from those groups that were against desegregation, i.e., the KKK.)[/#800000][/font]
You need research it this country and its freedoms were found upon a rebellion\protest\riot against the establishment. [font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000](I don't need to research anything. I'm 74 years young, graduated from High School and College. I do know how and when our country was formed and by whom and for what reasons. I am 100% sure that what went on in the late 1700s has absolutely NO correlation with the riots happening today over Trumps election. I'm not surprised at all by the fact that you don't see that.) [/#800000][/font]
Give it break with self appointing yourself with a successful argument your argument is hypocrisy to say the least considering your rant on this board could be considered a protest[font "Comic Sans MS"][#800000]....(I'll give it a break when somebody from the far left can defend this disgusting show of ignorance and crybaby attitude from the Liberal masses over Donald Trumps election. It's obvious that you don't have the talent to do so. Most Liberals hardly ever do have the talent. But it sure is entertaining to watch them try.) [#000000][/[/#000000][/#800000][/font]quote]
[signature]
Bob Hicks, from Utah
I'm 82 years young and going as hard as I can for as long as I can.
"Free men do not ask permission to bear arms."
I'm 82 years young and going as hard as I can for as long as I can.
"Free men do not ask permission to bear arms."