08-31-2005, 04:35 PM
Wednesday, August 31, 2005 - 12:00 AM [url "http://www.harktheherald.com/print.php?sid=63318"]
[/url] | [url "http://www.harktheherald.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Recommend_Us&file=index&req=FriendSend&sid=63318"]
[/url]
Utah Lake land public, judge says
Caleb Warnock DAILY HERALD
A federal judge has protected public access to a portion of Utah Lake.
One of the longest-running land battles in Utah Valley's modern history has come a step closer to resolution.
State officials are claiming victory after a federal judge ruled that disputed land along the eastern boundary of Utah Lake belongs to the federal government and not a private owner. [url "http://heraldextra.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=display_ads&file=index&func=display_ad&ad=00273252"][/url]
[url "http://adserver.harktheherald.com/adclick.php?n=a1d19a67"]
[/url]
The ruling means establishing the boundary of the Powell Slough portion of the lake is now a contest between only the state and the federal government, which have "similar management goals," said Michael Johnson of the Utah Attorney General's Office.
"Public access will be protected," Johnson said. "We are confident the public's interest will be preserved since it won't be in private hands."
Although there is an ongoing lawsuit over the boundary of the entire lake, the judge chose to settle the question of ownership in the Powell Slough area first because it was the only place where three groups -- private owners, the state, and the federal government -- were all claiming to own the same land.
According to court papers, James Clinger took out a patent on land in the Powell Slough area in 1881. It is the lakeside boundary of that land which has been in dispute. The state originally sued 12 landowners in the Powell Slough area, and has recently settled with all but the Clinger Family Partnership, said Johnson.
M. Dayle Jeffs, attorney for the partnership, could not be reached for comment.
A judge must still decide the boundary of public and private ownership on disputed land around the rest of the lake and the Powell Slough decision will speed up that case, Johnson said. Eighty percent of landowners have settled with the state.
The court case over the remaining 20 percent is expected to take at least a year.
Protecting public access to Powell Slough was especially critical because "it is a large tract of good habitat for birds and fish and so forth, and of interest to the public and fishermen and hunters," Johnson said. "There are a lot of people who like to go down and use that area and we've been concerned about having private areas where people might be barred from going."
The judge in Thursday's ruling also reiterated that the boundary around the entire lake will be based upon evidence of the shoreline as it existed on the date of statehood in 1896, Johnson said. The Attorney General's Office will use old photos, water-level records and interviews from lakefront property owners from the turn of the century to help guide the decision.
In December 2003, attorneys on both sides of the controversial lawsuit over the boundary of Utah Lake claimed victory in a judge's decision to disallow fixing the boundary of the lake at 4,481 feet above sea level. At that boundary line, Provo Bay would become private property.
In that decision, Judge Kimball denied the landowners' request for judgments fixing the lake boundary at 4,481 feet, and the court vacated a previous boundary judgment on one piece of property that was based on that stipulation.
Kimball also told all Utah Lake shoreline landowners to cease diking and fencing land that state attorneys claim belongs to the public.
The Utah Attorney General's Office said at the time that the state was prepared to show evidence that the boundary line should be set as high as 4,492 feet above sea level.
Beginning in 1994, 80 percent of private shoreline landowners settled a boundary dispute with the state, but 20 percent have refused to do so, prompting the state to file the 1997 suit -- now one of the longest-running land battles in Utah Valley's modern history.
For nearly 150 years, farmers around the lake have expanded and retracted their farms to follow the lake's changing water levels, often without a clear legal definition as to where their property ended and where the state-owned lake bed began.
According to Utah's constitution, the state owns the bed of the lake, but ownership of the land surrounding Utah Lake was given to pioneer landowners almost 50 years before Utah's constitution was ratified in 1895.
An earlier U.S. Supreme Court ruling had said landowners owned to the high-water mark on the day of statehood, but did not define the high-water mark.
[i] Caleb Warnock can be reached at 756-7669 ext. 19 or cwarnock@heraldextra.com.[/i]This story appeared in The Daily Herald on page A10.
[signature]
![[Image: print.gif]](http://www.harktheherald.com/images/global/print.gif)
![[Image: friend.gif]](http://www.harktheherald.com/images/global/friend.gif)
Utah Lake land public, judge says
Caleb Warnock DAILY HERALD
A federal judge has protected public access to a portion of Utah Lake.
One of the longest-running land battles in Utah Valley's modern history has come a step closer to resolution.
State officials are claiming victory after a federal judge ruled that disputed land along the eastern boundary of Utah Lake belongs to the federal government and not a private owner. [url "http://heraldextra.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=display_ads&file=index&func=display_ad&ad=00273252"][/url]
The ruling means establishing the boundary of the Powell Slough portion of the lake is now a contest between only the state and the federal government, which have "similar management goals," said Michael Johnson of the Utah Attorney General's Office.
"Public access will be protected," Johnson said. "We are confident the public's interest will be preserved since it won't be in private hands."
Although there is an ongoing lawsuit over the boundary of the entire lake, the judge chose to settle the question of ownership in the Powell Slough area first because it was the only place where three groups -- private owners, the state, and the federal government -- were all claiming to own the same land.
According to court papers, James Clinger took out a patent on land in the Powell Slough area in 1881. It is the lakeside boundary of that land which has been in dispute. The state originally sued 12 landowners in the Powell Slough area, and has recently settled with all but the Clinger Family Partnership, said Johnson.
M. Dayle Jeffs, attorney for the partnership, could not be reached for comment.
A judge must still decide the boundary of public and private ownership on disputed land around the rest of the lake and the Powell Slough decision will speed up that case, Johnson said. Eighty percent of landowners have settled with the state.
The court case over the remaining 20 percent is expected to take at least a year.
Protecting public access to Powell Slough was especially critical because "it is a large tract of good habitat for birds and fish and so forth, and of interest to the public and fishermen and hunters," Johnson said. "There are a lot of people who like to go down and use that area and we've been concerned about having private areas where people might be barred from going."
The judge in Thursday's ruling also reiterated that the boundary around the entire lake will be based upon evidence of the shoreline as it existed on the date of statehood in 1896, Johnson said. The Attorney General's Office will use old photos, water-level records and interviews from lakefront property owners from the turn of the century to help guide the decision.
In December 2003, attorneys on both sides of the controversial lawsuit over the boundary of Utah Lake claimed victory in a judge's decision to disallow fixing the boundary of the lake at 4,481 feet above sea level. At that boundary line, Provo Bay would become private property.
In that decision, Judge Kimball denied the landowners' request for judgments fixing the lake boundary at 4,481 feet, and the court vacated a previous boundary judgment on one piece of property that was based on that stipulation.
Kimball also told all Utah Lake shoreline landowners to cease diking and fencing land that state attorneys claim belongs to the public.
The Utah Attorney General's Office said at the time that the state was prepared to show evidence that the boundary line should be set as high as 4,492 feet above sea level.
Beginning in 1994, 80 percent of private shoreline landowners settled a boundary dispute with the state, but 20 percent have refused to do so, prompting the state to file the 1997 suit -- now one of the longest-running land battles in Utah Valley's modern history.
For nearly 150 years, farmers around the lake have expanded and retracted their farms to follow the lake's changing water levels, often without a clear legal definition as to where their property ended and where the state-owned lake bed began.
According to Utah's constitution, the state owns the bed of the lake, but ownership of the land surrounding Utah Lake was given to pioneer landowners almost 50 years before Utah's constitution was ratified in 1895.
An earlier U.S. Supreme Court ruling had said landowners owned to the high-water mark on the day of statehood, but did not define the high-water mark.
[i] Caleb Warnock can be reached at 756-7669 ext. 19 or cwarnock@heraldextra.com.[/i]This story appeared in The Daily Herald on page A10.
[signature]