Posts: 253
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
Thanks for all the interest in the unorthodox catch and release of Tiger Musky post. There are alternatives to taking fish out of the fishery.
I have contacted the DWR and submitted a suggestion to put in a slot limit for Tiger Musky at pineview. 40" - 46" musky can be kept and killed, all other released.
I am thrilled that the latest record was caught by a guy who has fished for a total of 16 hours for Tigers. Pineview is one of the best Tiger Musky fisheries in the world, and I would like to do my part to keep it that way, therefore the suggestion.
[signature]
Posts: 1,964
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation:
0
I'm wondering why you'd advocate, or allow 40 - 46'' fish to be kept, but protect anything that gets bigger? They're not going to spawn. They are already getting old. That's why the DWR allows the harvest that they do. Are we going to let the few fish that got over the 46" mark die of old age? Why? They aren't going to get much bigger than that anyway.
Fishrmn
Posts: 1,791
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2003
Reputation:
0
I am not understanding?
[signature]
Posts: 59
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
0
YEA I HAVE FISHED 16 HOURS FOR TIGERS THIS YEAR TO CATCH THE RECORD FISH,NOT COUNTING ALL THE HOURS I HAVE FISHED IN THE LAST 6-7 YEARS I HAVE PROBABLY HAVE 6-10 TRIPS A YEAR TO PINEVIEW,AND COUNTLESS HOURS PUT IN FOR THEM FISH.I HAVE RELEASED AROUND 25 TIGERS AT PINEVIEW,THAT I WOULDNT EVEN WOULD TAKE OUT OF THE WATER FOR A PICTURE.AND CATCHING OVER 12 OVER 40 INCHES AND KEEPING 2,I HAVE DID MY FARE SHARE OF RELEASING THEM AND STILL WILL.I THINK YOU NEED TO FIND OUT THE FACTS BEFORE YOU START TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE.
[signature]
Posts: 583
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2002
Reputation:
0
I think the point trying to be made is the fact that we have one of the greatest if not the greatest Tiger fishing holes right in our back yard. We may be simply taking it for granted. Maybe they can even get larger and we will never know if we don't protect some of the larger ones. Pineview is a bit of an anomaly.
There aren't many destinations where you can go out and catch 4 Tiger Musky in a day and most likely have at least one over 40". I wonder what it's potential really is?
[signature]
Posts: 59
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
0
I ALSO DO NOT AGREE ON THIS ,IF ALL OF US KEEP REALEASING ALL THE FISH OVER 40 INCHES ,SOONER OR LATER PINEVIEW IS GOING TO TURN TO CRAP,BECAUSE OF ALL THE 35 INCHERS AND ABOVE ARE EATING THE SMALLER TIGERS THAT THE DWR HAVE PLANTED EVERY FEW YEARS,AND THATS GOING TO HURT THE POPULATION IF WE DONT ABIDE BY THE DWR REGULATIONS, I MEAN THEY ARE THE ONES DOING THE STUDY ABOUT THEM AND ALL THE OLDER MUSKIES ARE EATING SOME OF THE SMALLER IMATURE MUSKIES,SO WE ARE HELPING THE POPULATION OF THEM BY KEEPING A BIG TIGER TO MOUNT,IM NOT SAYING TO KEEP EVERY 40 INCHER BUT PICK A SIZE YOU WANT TO GO OVER AND ONCE YOU HAVE, KEEP ONE. AND AGAIN I HAVE FISHED FOR A HELL OF A LOT LONGER TIME AT PINEVIEW THAN 16 HOURS,THAT HAS BEEN THIS YEAR ONLY,NOT INCLUDING ALL THE PAST 6-7 YEARS.
[signature]
Posts: 238
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2002
Reputation:
0
Go to the Great Lakes area and fish for tigers and muskies and then you will understand.
[signature]
Posts: 1,791
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2003
Reputation:
0
Why 40-46? Why not larger, why not smaller?
[signature]
Posts: 3,536
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation:
0
I'd rather see just increasing the minimum size that you can keep from 40" to maybe 42" or 45" or whatever # is found to be most prudent (maybe 40" already IS that #, I don't know).
[signature]
Posts: 6,353
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
I kept a 43" tiger 4 years ago because it would not revive after 30 minutes. I ate it and will never bother with it again. They taste like sh**. I don't know about a smaller one, but i will not keep another unless it beats the record. YES I WILL KEEP A FISH IF IT IS A RECORD! Like so many other comments about being at the end of their life span, i don't think it hurts anything by taking a few out. I would not advise all 40+"ers being kept, but a trophy fish to someone is special if they have the proper intent on keeping and mounting it. My 2 cents. If you don't like it, OH WELL!
[signature]
Posts: 3,517
Threads: 27
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
3
Believe it or not, if you talk to the fish biologist for this area, I think you will hear him say that alot of these big fish die after being released any way do to the strain of the fight. We have been told that in the past by a certain biologist. [  ]
[signature]
Posts: 583
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2002
Reputation:
0
I have heard the same on the mortality thing. I think you should always bring them in as fast as possible and take your time reviving them if it is a hot day. I know they grow over 50" in there. It sure would be cool to one day hold one over 55"
[signature]
Posts: 3,088
Threads: 22
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation:
13
for those of you that have kept larger fish -- quit justifying the reason you kept them to these yahoos!!
If you catch a trophy fish, and the law allows you to keep, then by all means KEEP IT! SHOW IT OFF. BE PROUD OF IT. Don't let it go, because some selfish dude on the internet thinks that you need to let it go for "others" to enjoy as well. That fish has been enjoyed by others already.
It's up to you to decide what a trophy is. Trophies for one person may be different than another. If you commonly catch 40" Musky, then a 40" Musky is no trophy. But if you've never caught a fish over 30", and you catch a 40+" Musky -- keept it. Congratulations on a well deserved trophy!
[signature]
Posts: 69
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Well Said,,,My thoughts exactly.
[signature]
Posts: 608
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
i have a cwmu deer this year. im thinking on tranquilizing him petting em for a while, a few snap shots and returning him to the wild.[  ]
[signature]
Posts: 608
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
pacfan you used to be a guide at deseret? my kid drew a elk tag any suggestions on a guide he can request.
[signature]
Posts: 3,517
Threads: 27
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
3
I would go with Teddy, or Chuck. Rick usually only keeps the best guides employed from year to year. If Joe is still working there he is also a good one. Those would be my picks if you have a choice. You may not have that option. P.M. me and I'll give you some more info and a contact or two. [cool]
[signature]
Posts: 837
Threads: 1
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation:
0
Pack,
I am surprised you didn't mention Kenny V. Is there a better guide on Deseret??
[signature]
Posts: 583
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2002
Reputation:
0
[reply]
If you catch a trophy fish, and the law allows you to keep, then by all means KEEP IT! SHOW IT OFF. BE PROUD OF IT. Don't let it go, because some selfish dude on the internet thinks that you need to let it go for "others" to enjoy as well. That fish has been enjoyed by others already.
[/reply]
I hope to some day fish with you. At that time you can keep every fish you want that is legal. I won't say a thing. In fact I will catch and donate my limit to you if it is more of a put and take fishery.
[signature]
Posts: 3,088
Threads: 22
Joined: Jul 2003
Reputation:
13
tightline -- let's do it. At that time, you might learn that some of your pre-conceived ideas about me are not what you thought.
Expecting your average fisherman to release the fish of a life-time is ludicrous. You'll never see, or hear, me complain about a fisherman doing something legal.
I rarely keep fish. Brook trout, and splake are about the only fish I ever keep. But, if I caught a 40" musky -- you bet I'd keep it.
Wait a minute -- am I justifying why I keep fish to some dude on an internet forum? Let's just go fishing. Maybe we can both learn something.
[signature]
|
