04-06-2014, 09:51 PM
Got your attention!
I had a "chat" with Eric Bradshaw with Parks and Recreation (thanks Bob!). I was curious about the new launch, and my suggestion that they install wakeless buoys around the launch area to protect the new ramp from the reckless. No buoys for now, but he did inform me there are plans to "install" a lake-wide wakeless "rule" on the lake when the water drops below a certain level (TBD). Would include posted signs, and educating boaters and enforcers alike. Probably won't help the un-educated, but at least gives the lawgivers some tooth.
I took that as good news. Could be better! I'd suggested circulating a petition from those who would favor the whole lake going wakeless, or at least defining - say the area by the dam being designated wakeless. I have no idea how to do that "online", but if anyone has suggestions - I'm open.
He did indicate feedback from users is welcome, and helps guide their decision making process and future planning.
I had also inquired if a launch-fee was coming (to pay for the improvements). No was the reply.
Just thought I'd share. I see it as a move in the right direction for that little puddle.
Any suggestions for petitioning - I'd appreciate you support, feedback, "signatures", or maybe a letter writing campaign?
I didn't ask anything about future stocking plans, but it's another point of inquiry.
I had a "chat" with Eric Bradshaw with Parks and Recreation (thanks Bob!). I was curious about the new launch, and my suggestion that they install wakeless buoys around the launch area to protect the new ramp from the reckless. No buoys for now, but he did inform me there are plans to "install" a lake-wide wakeless "rule" on the lake when the water drops below a certain level (TBD). Would include posted signs, and educating boaters and enforcers alike. Probably won't help the un-educated, but at least gives the lawgivers some tooth.
I took that as good news. Could be better! I'd suggested circulating a petition from those who would favor the whole lake going wakeless, or at least defining - say the area by the dam being designated wakeless. I have no idea how to do that "online", but if anyone has suggestions - I'm open.
He did indicate feedback from users is welcome, and helps guide their decision making process and future planning.
I had also inquired if a launch-fee was coming (to pay for the improvements). No was the reply.
Just thought I'd share. I see it as a move in the right direction for that little puddle.
Any suggestions for petitioning - I'd appreciate you support, feedback, "signatures", or maybe a letter writing campaign?
I didn't ask anything about future stocking plans, but it's another point of inquiry.