Posts: 2,775
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Oct 2002
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
 
	
	
		Have you seen a reg change in the proclamation . I don't think it went thru . I heard it got held up .
[signature]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,775
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Oct 2002
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
 
	
	
		I take that back . it has changed . Some guy down in Sportsman told me it didn't get changed but it looks like it did .
[signature]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,646
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Jan 2003
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
 
	
	
		     [#800000][size 2]Under highlights of the 2004 Utah Fishing Proclamtion: (1) General fishing regulations will apply on the Provo River from Charleston Bridge upstream to the Legacy Bridge at Hwy 113(Midway Lane). Previously this has been flies and lures only with a 2-fish limit. This change was approved by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Wildlife Board to encourage harvest of an over abundant brown trout population.[/size][/#800000] 
[size 2][#800000]What this means to me? 2 fish limit under 15 inches. This is per IV Season dates and Bag and Possession Limits section C-6-n(see Provo River sections c/d underGeneral Provisions). [/#800000][/size]
[signature]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 2,775
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Oct 2002
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
 
	
	
		I might have to go take some plastics down and give it a whirl now . Not that I want trout to eat , but have missed fishing it since the no scent regs .
[signature]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 1,646
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Jan 2003
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
 
	
	
		    [size 2]They screwed up the Proclamation.   The Highlights section says the artifical flies and lures only has been lifted.   But, the General Provisions section doesn't have the new change.  OOPS![blush] [/size]
[signature]
	
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 107
	Threads: 0
	Joined: Mar 2003
	
Reputation: 
0
	 
 
	
	
		Check the proclamation again.  It says that the regulations from Midway Lane to Jordanelle dam are artificials only and 2 trout limit.  There is no mention of the section between Charleston bridge and Midway Lane because it is now general regulations--general reg. waters are not covered in this section ("Specific Exceptions to the General Provisions).
[signature]