Posts: 95
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
0
Have narrowed it down to these 2. Anyone used either? Have had a quickfish3 for a number of years and has been a good one. Just looking for opinions. Have seen a couple reviews of the fatfish peeling on the inside, I find that hard to believe but if it is true then I dont want it.
[signature]
Posts: 3,724
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
0
I'd go with clam ice tents any day comparing to the crappy Eskimo series.
I didn't bother using my heater last season.
[signature]
Posts: 593
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2006
Reputation:
0
Check out the "Otter" series of ice shelters - I love mine! The best ice shelter that I have been in.
[signature]
Posts: 125
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
0
I own a Frabrill 2 man ice tent, an Eskimo quick fish 3 and another Frabill 6 man. I am looking at getting the Eskimo Fatfish 6 sided. Roomier than my Frabill 6 man and I think the quality and durability is a little better also. The Fatfish I am looking at is a little bigger than the one you are interested in. Mine would be quilted (insulated). Fairly heavy (over 50 lbs) but with a snowmobile to tote it onto the ice, it doesn't really matter much. I have really liked my Eskimo quick fish... a lot. I would match it up to any brand. I likely will sell the Frabill 6 man and Eskimo quick fish 3. I don't need 4 ice tents. I have had my 6 man for 3 seasons, this would be my 4th. My quick fish 3 I have had for 4 years and this will be my 5th season. I have not had the quick fish 3 out on the ice in the last 3 years. Both are in great shape. If anyone is interested in purchasing a used popup, contact me.
[signature]
Posts: 178
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2009
Reputation:
0
I have the fat fish and hate it. Sucks in the wind,which is the only time I want a tent, and cheaply made.
[signature]
Posts: 1,781
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2010
Reputation:
0
I own the Otter Lodge.
Very high quality.
Good luck with your decision.
[signature]
Posts: 21
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation:
0
I have seen interiors peeling and recommend staying away from that model, but if you have a bit more $ and can handle more weight, then check out the 949i (insulated). The interior is a thermal quilted layer and it appears v. tuff. Just got it and set mine up in the backyard last weekend and I'm anxious to try her out on the ice. About $50 more and I feel its worth every penny, and the 949 is roomy too as you probably already know.
[signature]
Posts: 95
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation:
0
I looked at the insulated version. I am on foot towing the sled so weight is definitely an issue for me. I ended up ordering the clam last night. I thank you all for the opinions. So I will have a quickfish3 for sale if anyone is interested.
[signature]
Posts: 21
Threads: 4
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation:
0
Hope that works out great with the new Clam. I too am on foot, but with all the room I have in the Eskimo I shall invite a friend...to help haul it for me.
[signature]
Posts: 87
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Great call! I LOVE Clam products!!
[signature]
Posts: 125
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
0
I just bought the Eskimo 6120i tonight. It is the bigger version, 80 sf of space, and insulated. Weighs 52 lbs. It seems to be a very solid tent. The salesman told me it was very solid in the wind. Says he has used one. Guess we will see. I am looking forward to using it this winter. Only down side I see to it is the 5'-6"+ length when packed and folded. Gonna need to modify my sled to be able to get it out on the ice. I would certainly not want to pull it anywhere on foot.
[signature]
Posts: 494
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2015
Reputation:
0
Anyone get one of those new Cabelas XL2000s yet? I have my eye on it...anyone have an opinion even if they don't own it?
[signature]